Independent
Software Developer
HR Manager
Team Leader
Accountant
Copy Writer
Customer Service
Virtual Assistance
What 39 Percent Really Means
In 2010, Dell sold its captive offshore service centre. So did Citigroup, Unilever, and Deutsche Bank.
The industry rule of thumb at the time was that roughly 60 percent of wholly-owned offshore centres failed to meet expectations.
The model collapsed; the work went back to third-party BPOs; the lesson was supposed to be settled.
The 2026 data says it isn’t.
Q1 leasing in Manila tells the story in square metres. Of 232,000 sq.m. of gross office demand, IT-BPM firms took 79,000. Within that pool, Global Capability Centres claimed 39 percent — up from near-zero five years ago.
Third-party BPOs still hold the rest, but the slice that’s growing isn’t theirs.
Leechiu Property Consultants, which compiled the numbers, was blunt about who the new tenants are: GCCs are “not chasing the lowest cost per seat.”
Five years ago, this was zero
The Philippine third-party BPO sector is not shrinking. CXAP data released at Contact Islands 2026 shows revenue of $33.9 billion in 2025, up 6.9 percent, with a $35.7 billion forecast for 2026. The sector employs 1.68 million people.
It’s losing share of new spend, not absolute headcount. That’s the harder story.
The new spend is going somewhere visible. In the same week the Leechiu data dropped, CIBC and Nestlé announced new Hyderabad GCCs — joining Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan, and HSBC in the same cluster.
Kraft Heinz opened a second Indian GCC in Bengaluru. SBM Offshore, a Dutch energy company, explicitly reframed its Bengaluru office as a “strategic global capability hub” — not a delivery centre.
The buildings are the same. The signs on the door have changed.
What 2010 taught, and what 2026 forgot
The honest objection: this has been tried. Captives have failed at scale before — attrition spirals, governance overhead, culture transmission that didn’t transmit. Sixty percent of the wholly-owned centres set up in the prior wave didn’t survive.
Three things are different this time. The setup is faster — a “12-week velocity framework” compresses what used to be a year-long build.
AI tooling does some of the governance lift that drove the old failures.
And there are mature playbooks now where in 2010 there were only consultants.
What hasn’t changed is the recession test. None of the 2026 captives has lived through one yet. The 2010 wave didn’t either, until it did.
The dividing line
Pick up enough industry writing on GCCs and one sentence keeps surfacing: “Vendor-managed outsourcing delivers compliance. Brand-native GCC models deliver competitive advantage.”
That’s the dividing line. Captives buy capability; third-party BPOs sell cost-controlled compliance.
India hosts 1,800+ active GCCs employing 2.1 million people on $70 billion of revenue, and the next intake will launch with 15 to 25 percent of headcount in AI/ML roles inside their first 18 months.
Captives are where the AI capability is being staffed, not outsourced.
The work that doesn’t justify owning capability — high-volume contact-centre support, regulated compliance processing, predictable back-office throughput — stays with third-party providers. That’s most of the 61 percent.
For a buyer, the procurement question isn’t “build or buy?” anymore. It’s “is this work I want to own the IP of, or is this work I want delivered at predictable cost?”
The BPOs that survive sell captives
The cleanest read of the 2026 data is that captive-vs-BPO is becoming a false binary.
Genpact was named “GCC Orchestrator” — the top tier — in the HFS Horizons: GCC Services 2026 report.
Translation: HFS’s highest-tier provider is a BPO that builds and runs captives on behalf of clients.
TCS, Infosys, Wipro, and Capgemini all sell Build-Operate-Transfer as a standard product. Infosys BPM offers BOT, joint ventures, and fully managed hybrid models on the same page of its website.
The BPOs that survive aren’t the ones competing with captives. They’re the ones who can build them.
So the question for a Philippine or Indian BPO operator in 2026 isn’t “how do we hold the 61 percent?” It’s “are we equipped to deliver the 39?”
Manila has built a captive coup. The smartest operators in Manila are quietly putting themselves on the winning side of it.
The question for your business
Is your offshore strategy buying compliance — or building capability you’ll own in five years?
