Philippine offshore gaming operators (POGO)

Philippine offshore gaming operators, known as POGOs, were online gambling companies licensed by PAGCOR to serve players outside the Philippines. POGOs were the only casino segment classified as BPO, and the sector was formally banned by President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. in July 2024 after years of pressure over fraud, trafficking, and tax-evasion concerns.

A Philippine offshore gaming operator was a PAGCOR-registered company running internet casinos, sports books, or live-dealer streams for foreign customers, primarily Chinese nationals, since gambling is illegal in mainland China. Operators paid licence fees, withholding taxes on foreign staff, and a 5% gross gaming revenue tax under Republic Act No. 11590, signed in 2021 (Official Gazette of the Philippines).

The sector existed in a strange overlap with mainstream outsourcing. Back-office support, customer service, and IT functions for offshore gaming were treated as BPO subsectors — even while the front-end product was casino gambling. That dual identity is why POGOs kept appearing in Philippine outsourcing statistics until the 2024 ban.

On 22 July 2024, in his State of the Nation Address, the president ordered all POGOs shut down by the end of that year, citing human trafficking, money laundering, and financial scam compounds. The 2024 directive ended what had been a controversial but tax-generating sector.

How it works

PAGCOR issued licences in three product buckets (e-casino, sports betting, and sports betting on regulated wagering events, or SBRWE) with separate operating categories for live-dealer streaming versus pure back office. Operators were required to host servers and staff inside Philippine economic zones, route player funds through PAGCOR-monitored channels, and remit 5% of gross gaming revenue plus a 25% withholding tax on foreign worker salaries (Philippine Bureau of Internal Revenue).

Players had to be foreign nationals aged 21 or older, located outside the Philippines at the moment of play. Geo-fencing, KYC checks, and offshore payment rails were the compliance backbone, though enforcement was uneven, which is what eventually drew regulator attention.

By the wind-down, an estimated 50,000+ foreign workers, mostly Chinese, were employed in Manila, Pasay, Parañaque, and surrounding NCR cities, with secondary clusters in Cebu and Pampanga (PAGCOR).

Examples

Bloomberry Resorts and Solaire-linked service vendors operated licensed POGO-adjacent platforms in Parañaque before exiting the sector. Suncity Group — the Macau-based junket operator — ran several Philippine licences before its 2022 collapse, after founder Alvin Chau was convicted of fraud and illegal gambling in a Macau court (Al Jazeera).

In March 2024, a raid on a compound in Bamban, Tarlac exposed a POGO licensee allegedly tied to human trafficking and crypto scam operations, a case that became a turning point in the political debate. The fallout reached then-mayor Alice Guo, whose citizenship and ties to the compound triggered Senate hearings and helped accelerate the policy reversal.

By contrast, mainstream Philippine BPO firms like Concentrix, TaskUs, and Accenture Manila never held POGO licences and were structurally separate from the offshore gaming sector, despite occasional confusion in foreign press coverage.

Related terms

• Business process outsourcing (BPO): the broader Philippine industry POGOs were officially classified within.
• Offshoring: the cross-border service model POGOs used to reach foreign players.
• Contact center: the legitimate inbound/outbound service segment often confused with POGO back office.
• Foreign direct investment (FDI): the capital channel through which Chinese-backed POGO firms entered the Philippines.
• Knowledge process outsourcing (KPO): higher-value outsourcing distinct from gaming-adjacent back office.
• Shared services and outsourcing (SSO): another structural cousin in the Philippine services map.
• Information technology outsourcing (ITO): the IT services category that supplied many POGO platforms.

FAQ

Are POGOs still legal in the Philippines?

No. President Marcos ordered all POGOs shut down by 31 December 2024 during his July 2024 State of the Nation Address. PAGCOR began revoking licences and de-registering operators through the second half of 2024.

Who regulated POGOs?

The Philippine Amusement and Gaming Corporation (PAGCOR) issued and supervised POGO licences. Tax collection sat with the Bureau of Internal Revenue under Republic Act No. 11590, with anti-money-laundering oversight from the AMLC.

Why were POGOs banned?

Marcos cited human trafficking, financial scams, kidnappings, and money laundering tied to POGO compounds, especially after the 2024 Bamban raid. Senate hearings produced enough evidence that the political cost of keeping the sector outweighed its tax contribution.

Were POGOs really considered BPO?

Yes, technically. PAGCOR and the Department of Trade and Industry classified POGO back-office and live-dealer operations as BPO subsectors, which is why they appeared in Philippine outsourcing data. Mainstream BPO industry groups largely rejected the association.

How much tax did POGOs generate?

Reported gross gaming revenue in 2022 was about PHP 1.67 billion, with a 5% GGR tax plus 25% withholding on foreign worker pay. Actual collections fell well below projections, which weakened the fiscal case for keeping the sector.

What happened to POGO workers after the ban?

Foreign workers, mostly Chinese, were required to leave or transfer to other visa categories. Filipino support staff faced layoffs, and the Department of Labor opened reskilling programs to redirect workers into mainstream BPO and tourism roles.

Looking to build a legitimate Philippine outsourcing team that avoids the POGO grey zone? Talk to Outsource Accelerator about vetted BPO partners.